Tension in Cross River Over Disputed Inauguration of Federal Road Projects
A controversy has erupted in Cross River State following conflicting accounts over the alleged disruption of a federal government project inauguration in Calabar, with accusations directed at the administration of Governor Bassey Otu and a firm denial issued by the state government.
Allegations of Interference
Initial reports claimed that preparations for the inauguration of a road project executed by the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) were forcefully halted at Idang Road in Calabar South Local Government Area.
According to these accounts, the Chairman of Calabar South LGA, Patrick Archibong, allegedly led a team that blocked access to the venue using security personnel and heavy equipment. Structures set up for the ceremony—including canopies, a stage, and signage—were reportedly dismantled.
It was further alleged that billboards displaying the image of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, erected to mark the project, were removed. The chairman was said to have claimed he acted on instructions from the state governor.
The inauguration was expected to be conducted by the Minister of Regional Development, Abubakar Momoh, who was in Calabar as the president’s representative. The minister reportedly described the alleged disruption as a setback to development efforts.
State Government’s Response
The Cross River State Government has, however, categorically denied the allegations, insisting that no disruption took place.
The Chief Press Secretary to the governor, Nsa Gill, stated that the situation was misrepresented. He explained that the issue arose from concerns that the state government was not adequately involved in the planning of the inauguration, despite contributing significantly to one of the projects.
According to Gill, the Nyagasang road project was funded approximately 70 per cent by the state government and 30 per cent by the NDDC. He said stakeholders—including the minister, state officials, and NDDC representatives—jointly agreed to postpone the inauguration of that particular project.
He also clarified that another road project at Idang was successfully inaugurated without incident and broadcast live, contradicting claims of a total disruption.
Unresolved Questions
The differing accounts leave key aspects of the incident disputed. While allegations suggest a forceful intervention that halted a federal event, the state government maintains that there was no destruction and that decisions were made through consultation.
No independent verification has publicly confirmed either version in full, and as of the time of reporting, federal authorities have not issued an official statement clarifying events.
Wider Implications
The episode has drawn attention to coordination challenges between federal and state actors, even within the same political platform, the All Progressives Congress.
Analysts note that such disputes—whether arising from communication gaps, political sensitivities, or competing claims of ownership—can undermine public confidence and delay the delivery of infrastructure projects.
Conclusion
What is clear is that a disagreement occurred around the planned inauguration of NDDC-backed road projects in Calabar. However, whether this amounted to an intentional disruption or a mismanaged coordination issue remains contested.
Until an official investigation or further clarification is provided, the full facts remain subject to competing narratives from involved parties.